When a Construction Bid Looks Good but the Details Do Not
The useful part is the detail that changes the decision.
A low number is not the same thing as a good bid.
Allowances are too vague, exclusions are missing, or the schedule is written in a way that
leaves too much room for drift.
The payment structure is front-loaded and does not tie clearly to milestones or deliverables.
Warranties, materials, and cleanup terms are hidden in a footnote rather than spelled out.
A directory page that helps users understand scope and category faster can catch some of that
confusion before the call.
What detail do you check first when a bid looks unusually cheap?